Understanding the Important Differences Between a Will and a Trust When Estate Planning

Eugene Strupinsky • January 8, 2026

Estate planning offers peace of mind, preserves your legacy, and protects your loved ones after you are gone. When preparing for the future, the most common legal instruments are wills and trusts. Knowing the key differences between these two tools can help you make informed decisions about how your assets will be managed and distributed.


What Is a Will?

A will is a legal document that details how you want your property and assets distributed upon your passing. It can also specify guardians for minor children and outline other final wishes. A will only takes effect after your death and must go through probate, a court-supervised process, to validate it and settle your estate. In New York, this process can be lengthy and public.


Key points about wills include:


  • A will allows you to name beneficiaries for your assets.
  • The probate court oversees the administration of your estate.
  • Probate is a public process, and documents become part of the public record.
  • Wills become effective only after death.


What Is a Trust?

A trust is a legal arrangement where a trustee holds and manages assets on behalf of beneficiaries, according to instructions provided in the trust document. Unlike a will, a trust can be active during your lifetime or established upon your death. Trusts can offer more privacy, as they do not go through probate. This makes them desirable for those seeking greater control and confidentiality.


Frequently used trusts, such as revocable living trusts, allow you to maintain control over assets while you are alive and to determine exactly how and when funds are distributed to beneficiaries. This is a particularly important consideration in New York, where owning real property across boroughs or states is common.


Key Differences Between a Will and a Trust

Understanding how a will and a trust differ is vital to comprehensive estate planning:


  • Probate: Wills require probate; most trusts do not.
  • Privacy: Probate makes will details public; trusts remain private.
  • Timing: Wills become effective after death; trusts can manage assets while you are living and after you pass away.
  • Flexibility: Trusts often provide greater control, such as specifying gradual asset distributions or providing care for a special needs family member.
  • Cost and Complexity: Trusts may involve upfront costs and more detailed planning, but can reduce costs and delays later by avoiding probate.


When Should You Choose a Will or a Trust?

The right choice often depends on your circumstances. If your estate is modest or you have straightforward wishes, a will may suffice. However, if you want to avoid probate, limit delays, or maintain privacy for your beneficiaries, setting up a trust can be the better option. In Brooklyn and across New York City, where real estate values are substantial and family structures are often complex, trusts are increasingly favored for their flexibility and discretion.


Additionally, families with minor children, blended families, or those owning properties in multiple states may benefit from consulting with an estate planning lawyer to tailor a solution to their needs.


Work With an Estate Planning Attorney for Your Needs

Whether you are interested in creating a will, establishing a trust, or developing a comprehensive estate plan in Brooklyn or New York, NY, working with a knowledgeable legal team ensures your assets and your loved ones are protected according to your wishes. Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. offers guidance in estate planning, probate & estate administration, and real estate law. To schedule a consultation, call 917-717-5007 or fill out the secure online form to discuss your estate planning options with professionals who understand the unique needs of New York families.




By Eugene Strupinsky April 24, 2026
Understand landlord and tenant rights, eviction laws, and recent legal updates with Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. Serving Brooklyn and New York, NY.
By Eugene Strupinsky April 17, 2026
Learn how Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. in Brooklyn and New York, NY can help your business protect trademarks, copyrights, and other IP assets with expert legal counsel.
By Eugene Strupinsky April 10, 2026
Learn how Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. in Brooklyn and New York, NY resolve common title issues such as easements, liens, and boundary disputes before real estate closings.
By Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. March 27, 2026
Learn how to begin filing for bankruptcy with Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. in Brooklyn and New York, NY. Get professional legal guidance for your financial future.
By Eugene Strupinsky March 19, 2026
Explore when businesses in Brooklyn and New York, NY should choose mediation or litigation with guidance from Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C., experienced in dispute resolution.
By Eugene Strupinsky March 16, 2026
Discover what bankruptcy can and cannot do for your finances. Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. in Brooklyn and New York, NY provides tailored legal guidance for your situation.
By Eugene Strupinsky March 12, 2026
Learn about the legal complexities of co-op and condo transfers in NYC with Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C., serving Brooklyn and New York, NY. Contact us for legal advice.
By Kayla Gaisi March 10, 2026
As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into our daily lives, it continues to raise legal questions that courts can no longer ignore. This month, the question of whether communications between criminal defendants and public AI are protected from government inspection was answered by Judge Jed Rakoff. That answer was an unequivocal 'no.' In the case at hand, defendant Bradely Heppner was charged with fraud and arrested a month later, in November 2025. When the FBI executed a search warrant at his home, they seized documents containing communications between him and the public AI platform Claude AI. According to Heppner's counsel, these communications reflected a defense strategy Heppner had generated in anticipation of potential indictment. Heppner asserted that these documents were either protected under attorney-client privilege or by the work product doctrine, arguing that he had used Claude for the purpose of obtaining legal advice and had shared these outputs with his attorneys. However, Judge Rakoff rejected both arguments. Attorney-client privilege applies only to communications between a client and a professional who owes them fiduciary duties and is subject to discipline. It is a socially valuable human relationship. Regardless of how advanced an AI systems is, it cannot meet this definition. Claude is not a human attorney and does not have an attorney-client relationship with its users, so communications with it cannot qualify for attorney-client privilege. Aside from this, Rakoff listed other reasons why Heppner's communications with Claude are not considered confidential. Firstly, Claude is a public AI system whose privacy policy discloses that communications can be shared with third parties including "governmental regulatory authorities." Secondly, as his counsel admitted, Heppner sought legal advice from Claude on his own volition, not at their direction. Even if Heppner received legal advice and later shared that with his counsel, that does not render the initially unprivileged communication privileged. The related work product doctrine fared no better for Heppner. This doctrine protects materials prepared by attorneys in anticipation of litigation from discovery by opposing parties. Here, the AI-generated documents were not prepared by or at the behest of counsel and did not reflect counsel's strategy. Thus, they fell outside the scope of the doctrine. Judge Rakoff's ruling matters because it maintains the narrowness of evidentiary privileges that is necessary for protecting the judicial system's truth-seeking function. Extending privilege to communications with public AI systems could create a dangerous loophoole, one where parties could shield discoverable information by filtering it through a chatbot. But given Rakoff's ruling, the main takeaway here is that attorneys should explicitly advise their clients not to share personal or legal information with public AI systems. Despite how routine it has now become for many to ask public AI personal questions, these communications are not confidential, and may ultimately be used as evidence in court. 
By Eugene Strupinsky February 27, 2026
Learn about costly business contract clauses and how Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. in Brooklyn, New York, ensures your agreements protect your interests.
By Eugene Strupinsky February 25, 2026
Navigate blended family estate planning with Khalifeh & Strupinsky, P.C. in Brooklyn and New York, NY. Learn key strategies tailored to your family’s needs.